A Course Focused on Museum Exhibitions

Author: mlindner

South America at SLAM: Vessels, Vessels, and More Vessels!

I had never been to the St. Louis Art Museum and had my partner come along on July 11th. As we walked up to the building, I was in awe of the magnitude and of its view overlooking a large body of water with fountains, known as ‘Art Hill’. Once I walked in, I continued to absorb the atmosphere. Once I was handed the map, I was focused on going to the Ancient Egyptians exhibit on the third floor. However, I found myself wondering the vast rooms and the seemingly, never-ending hallways of art. As I did, I caught a room full of ceramic vessels. I thought it fitting and smiled to myself as I entered a well lit and modestly presented room of South American ceramic vessels.

Photo taken by Morgan Lindner

I noticed right away that the bases and stands were all uniform. They were also the same throughout the museum and I appreciated that continuity. The vessels varied in sizes but the exhibit showed them with like sizes in the vitrines. The use of differing sized stands was a successful method to engage more interest in the exhibit while sharing a vitrine.

The room was well utilized and held many vessels. The pedestals were solid, creating a sense of a fuller room. The walls were scarce with information, with there being only one map with regional information about the ancient Andes. The panel of information included different societies such as the Paracas to the Inka. However I saw that other exhibits at SLAM had information adhered directly to the wall, versus being displayed on a panel. I noticed that difference immediately and wished that this room had more color and engaging material.

Photo taken by Morgan Lindner

This vitrine held vessels that were more colorful in their design. It also utilized differing stands while sharing an exhibit space. The labels were standard, using a generic and common font and typeface. I understand that these are expertly done, they just didn’t feel as interesting as they could have been. I did not feel an emotional connection to any of the vessels, besides having prior knowledge about them in our current class. The ceramics were intriguing and colorful. Having these vessels from different societies located in the Andes helped the public understand cultural differences in artistry, but also the similarities in their creation.

Photo taken by Morgan Lindner

The vitrine pictured above encased two similar vessels but placed them in a staggering manner, instead of aligning them. This made it more interesting to the viewer. Even though they were similar objects sharing a vitrine, they were still able to separate them. Focusing on the Wari vessel, the label reads as an expert created the label. However this being most likely true, to a 12 year old, this label would have been quickly passed. Children and some adults will not understand the words used in this label, especially if one is not knowledgable in this region’s culture. I did pass several children, all varying in age, and thought the art museum to be a boring place for them. I hate having that thought when I am a lover of all museums. To be a child and not be able to touch Roman or modern sculptures must be challenging and frustrating. SLAM did offer coloring and drawing for children in one of their larger rooms on the main floor. This was a great way to engage with children and try and foster a positive museum experience for them while they are young.

This exhibit contributed to my current knowledge of ceramics, by expanding the information on the small labels. They were interesting to read and kept my attention. The different colored vessels along with the Andean artistry told a story of their culture. Very bold and expressive. I had not seen South American vessels of that nature and appreciated the inclusion of them in this exhibit.

There is something for everyone at SLAM and you do not have to be an expert to have an appreciation for the arts. The labels for the South American exhibit read professionally which may be challenging for some. I did like how they read because I felt that the museum did their job as being a place for education. A critique I have for the exhibit is to include more color on the walls, or pictures to make the space more inviting for people to walk through. One enjoyment I can give praise to is the use of the space, they filled is appropriately and creatively. There were private tours full of conversation, groups of families talking about paintings, and laughter. That is the result any museum should strive for.

The Castle in the Corn

Fort de Chartres, source link below.

The Fort de Chartres is a state historic site under the protection of the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Historic Preservation division. It is located about 4 miles west of Prairie du Rocher, Illinois. The Fort has been coined the “Castle in the Corn” by locals due its seemingly random placement in the middle of farm land. The large structure was home to French settlers when they first inhabited the Illinois area in the 18th century (1753-1772). The Fort served as the central government and military base.

Fort de Chartres hosts many reenactments during the year and I was a visitor during their 2022 Fort de Chartres Rendezvous on June 4. It was a hot day but that did not stop visitors from walking through the Fort as men, women and children wore colonial clothing and stayed in traditional tents. For those with Native American lineage, they wore their traditional 18th century garb and stayed in teepees. Various homemade items such as wooden kitchenware, cast iron cookware and metals were available for purchase. The Rendezvous offered cannon shootings, musket shooting and battle reenactments with a full warring marching band.

Small diorama on the right side as you enter the museum, illustrating what life inside the Fort would have looked like.

The Fort museum is located in a side building within the grounds. The hours of operation are Tuesday to Sunday from 9 am to 4:30 pm. There are stairs to gain entrance into the museum and although there are not many, there is no wheelchair accessibility. Upon entering, the museum is cozy and fairly well lit with most lighting aimed at the exhibits. The space is well utilized with objects found on the grounds and details a small history of Fort de Chartres that can be heard audibly as you approach a diorama of the Fort.

The Fort is 1 of 4 left standing, originally a wooden fort.
A brief telling of the empire that had colonized in Prairie du Rocher. An example of the label size and information. Pictures are attached to the textured wall by double sided velcro and artifacts are attached with a clear thread, most likely fishing line.

The layout of the museum was very linear. The visitor followed a curated path of artifacts found on the Fort grounds. The exhibits seemed basic but well thought out. I was not very impressed but needed to remind myself that considering the financial limitations that are available to the Fort, having a museum at all is a gift to the public. There was limited space and the museum did a great job utilizing it to create as much traffic low as possible while also informing the public on various exhibits. The museum may be limited but they tried their best in engaging with visitors as best they could. The exhibitions were directed towards visitors with limited or no knowledge of the Fort’s history.

Objects available to touch as you made your way through the museum.
Drawers were available to open to view more objects. A great way to utilize limited space and offer as many artifacts as possible.

There was a lot of information to take in as they people started to file in. It being a celebration weekend, the site was busier than usual. I felt I was not able to look or read as much as I had intended due to the feeling of being rushed by other visitors and children. There were a lot of labels, but they did a good job of balancing the artifacts, maps and dioramas and information. Many of the exhibits were of ceramic plates, cufflinks, and a few guns. It kept the visitor interested without boring them. The space being narrow and small, it was not ideal for an influx of visitors. However, I was happy to see people visit the museum instead of bypassing it for other Rendezvous activities. The museum would benefit for some updating. Not necessarily technology but with newer labels and better lighting. I do not think that the museum had intended to mislead the public in any way, but some of the artifacts seemed to be replicas. There were no signs telling that they were original, yet there were no signs saying they were not either. Being a museum studies professional, I feel this is something that the Fort museum needs to address. Their security poses a concern as well. There seemed to be no true form of security besides a locked door, which makes me wonder how authentic some of the collection truly is.

Picture source

Fort de Chartres State Historic Site