Author: tagilbe

Source Analysis #3: The Slave Trade in St. Louis

Source Analysis #3: The Slave Trade in St. Louis

This article acknowledges the history of slave trading within St. Louis, it begins with a photograph of Benard Lynch’s “Slave Pen” which is now the site of Ballpark Village. Following the photograph was more information about the historical prominence of the site and what events occurred within it. The article also magnifies the importance of remembering the victims of St. Louis’s Slave Trade along with, the role that the St. Louis County Sheriff of 1843 enacted. In addition, this article celebrates how Representatives of Missouri State in 2021 arranged a memorial to commemorate the city’s enslaved residents who were victims of the slave trade. Lastly, this article ends illustration of an auction of enslaved people near the steps of the St. Louis Courthouse.

This article was created to reach the audience of the National Park Service of St. Louis and address the history of slavery in St. Louis. This article can teach about the history of slave trading in St. Louis while communicating that for many years the lives of enslaved victims in Benard Lynch’s “Slave Pen” went silenced until Missouri State Representatives felt a calling to repair injustice by holding a memorial for the enslaved victims in 2021. What surprised me most about this article was that it didn’t elaborate more upon the “Last Sale of Slaves” painting that Thomas Satterwhite Noble painted in 1865 and what all the illustration depicted.

Source Analysis #2: Teaching Hard History

Source Analysis #2: Teaching Hard History (Podcast: Episode 4, Season 2)

The Teaching Hard History Podcast: Episode 4, Season 2 discusses that when teaching elementary-age children about slavery many avoid explaining oppression and only focus on heroic figures. If students do not learn about slavery during early grades this may cause consequences for the rest of their education and educational experience. Dr. Kate Shuster provides an essential guide to navigate through the new Teaching Hard History K-5 framework from Learning for Justice. This framework is further discussed by a few elementary teachers who have already started to implement the framework within their classrooms.

The purpose of this source is to talk about how slavery is a hard piece of history to teach elementary-age children, which isn’t a reason to not teach slavery or even skip out pieces about slavery. The framework that was discussed acts as a guideline for teachers to utilize and implement in their classrooms.

This source helps us understand that our problem is rooted in the fact that many people don’t learn about slavery at all or enough during their elementary-age career. The framework created by Dr. Kate Shuster acts as an essential guide to how to teach an approach slavery to a K-5 audience.

This source is important to us because it shows what resource we can use to effectively address slavery to elementary-aged children.

Source Analysis #1: St. Louis Area Council on Restorative Justice

The St. Louis Area Council on Restorative Justice website educates its viewers about their mission and about restorative justice principles that they think are essential to implement through public and professional education. The website even includes more history about the council and previous projects. I found it very interesting that you can contact them about restorative training and also get more information about when their meetings are.

This source is important to us because it expresses the principles of restorative justice including what restorative justice is and acknowledges its impacts on victims and the community.

This source helps us understand exactly what the definition of restorative justice is and straightforward principles to consider when trying to restore injustices in communities.

This source reminds me of the resources I used last semester in my project about the BLM movement in STL. The organization has similar principles that the BLM organizations had about how to restore injustices.

Source Analysis: #4 – TaKara G.

Source Analysis #4

MOBOT WEBSITE FEATURES

When browsing the MOBOT website I discovered that they hold classes for all ages and families all year around at MOBOT, Shaw Nature Reserve, and Sophia M. Sachs Butterfly House. I noticed that these classes taught the public about botany, biology, holiday decorating, along with upcoming events that they hold. This led me to wonder if a class can be held to address MOBOT’s history and the effects it has on the garden today. I think creating a designated historical background class focusing on the garden’s history could be a great way to get the public engaged and informed about the history of the garden.

Another thing I discovered while browsing the MOBOT website was in the main menu in a section titled “Learn & Discover” where MOBOT focuses more on the scientific and educational approaches and therapeutic benefits about the garden and less about the historical background. I viewed this section of the website as an opportunity to share about the garden’s history with the public. To find out more about the garden’s history with enslavement you must do outside searches to get to this one singular page of the website which should be more accessible considering that they already have a “Learn & Discover” section designated to what the public can learn and discover more about pertaining to the garden.

I also found it quite interesting that on the website they advertise the celebration of various holidays and notable people who contributed to the garden. I think that it would be incredibly important to find a way to publicly honor the enslaved people through an event acknowledging how important their contribution to the garden was and who they were. Instead of only celebrating people like Dale Chihuly and Emily Dickinson honoring the lives that cultivated the land could be honored and their stories could be told to the public.

THE GARDEN AND SLAVERY

I think it’s great that MOBOT wants to move forward in diversity and inclusion. This page of the website is a great effort to do so, but I do think that this page of the website is considerably hidden from the public eye. It takes about five to six clicks to get to this section of the website and that’s knowing exactly what pages and menus to select. If there was a way to make this page of the website more accessible to the public, I think it would show more transparency about the events that took place at the garden in regarding its history.

Pertaining to the content of the page, I thought it was amazing that MOBOT took time to acknowledge the challenging history that the garden has by digitizing the relevant archival records. One thing that slightly disturbed me was the fact that if someone wanted to learn more, they would have to carry out their own research to do so. In order to drive the initiative of diversity and inclusion with full transparency I think providing viewers with a plethora of information so that they can carry their own research would be more practical. The information that can be provided by the MOBOT would be more reliable than any other outside source of information about its history.

Source Analysis #3 – TaKara

Source Analysis #3: Edwardsville Man 

What is the issue? 

In an article published by The Intelligencer: Edwardsville, Edwardsville resident Alan Vest had cultivated his yard with native and vegetative plants to attract pollinators, because of numerous citations and reoccurring city violations Vest’s collection of plants were removed by city workers. Vest sought to have his home recognized as a conservation home by HeartLands Conservatory, but failed to properly manage, plan, and maintain his collection of plants. In result his collection of plants did not meet the city ordinance requirements. Although Edwardsville does encourage the pollinators initiative to have native plants in yards, they also recommend that residents who want to contribute should receive information and further assistance at City Hall. 

Was this the right course of action? 

Unfortunately, I do believe that removing the collection of plants from Alan Vest’s yard was the correct approach to handling this issue because of Vest’s failure to comply with various opportunities to create the yard he had imagined. In the article it states that the mayor of Edwardsville even tried to contact Vest to address the proper information and the assistance he needed to attract pollinators and have his home recognized as a conservation home. I do think it is a little concerning that when action was taken Vest thought of this matter as “harassment” and “prejudice” that the city had against him. I think that it is important in matters like this to fully inform the violator about exactly what the violation is not just emphasizing the fact that they aren’t meeting standards and requirements. 

Source Analysis #1 – TaKara

Source Analysis #1: Wicked Problems

               When opening this chapter, I was very curious as to what a wicked problem was. The textbook defined a wicked problem as “difficult problems that cannot be addressed using only traditional approaches, such as scientific technological advances, and that require continuous attention because they can never be completely solved” this reminded me of the reparative justice cohort. We are all trying to publicly communicate the injustices of Henry Shaw and acknowledge how those enslaved people impacted the botanical garden, making it what it is today. The textbook also provides general characteristics of a wicked problem: vague problem definition, undefined solution, no end point, irreversible, unique, urgent. In my opinion I believe that our wicked problem is characterized by each of the following characteristics. The problem is vague because exactly how do we address the public about the notable yet shameful history of Henery Shaw, this all makes the solution undefined. Even though we could find a solution as technology advances and life goes on there will be more ways to communicate this problem, this leads to a never-ending turmoil. Regardless of what our solution looks like the effectiveness of what we do is irreversible, this makes the whole problem unique. Although there isn’t any drastic urgence of the matter, I think it is important to bring light to this problem because of how much the background history impacts the present and future possibilities beyond the botanical gardens but the region as a whole.

Multimodal Composition #1 – TaKara

Multimodal Composition #1: Defining Our Wicked Problem

Introduction 

We are partnering with Missouri Botanical Garden (MOBOT) to repair the injustices of garden owner and notable community member, Henry Shaw. As we seen on our field trip Henry Shaw’s Garden is beautifully cultivated and nurtured, but it is upsetting to know that this beauty started on the hands and knees of enslaved people. As we already know Shaw neglected the hard work of the enslaved people and took the credit for how well kept the garden was. As explained in the MOBOT website, the recorded documents of the enslaved people Shaw owned have no details about the specific duties of the enslaved people, but they are aware that their duties varied from outdoor lawn care to cooking in cleaning inside of the Tower Grove house. Even though Shaw wasn’t married and had no children the legacy of the garden remained, but how the enslaved people that contributed to his legacy story goes untold.  

What is our Wicked Problem? 

Our research team textbook, Sustainable World defines a wicked problem as “difficult problems that cannot be addressed using only traditional approaches, such as scientific technological advances, and that require continuous attention because they can never be completely solved.” This leads me to identifying our wicked problem which is that we want to publicly communicate the hidden injustices of Henry Shaw and acknowledge how those enslaved people impacted the botanical garden, making it what it is today. To better identify a wicked problem Sustainable World, highlights six general characteristics of a wicked problem: 

  1. Vague Problem Definition  
  1. Undefined Solution 
  1. No End Point 
  1. Irreversible  
  1. Unique  
  1. Urgent  

All the six general characteristics above can be used to characterize our wicked problem. I will be using each of them to dive into exactly how wicked our problem is and what ideas can consider moving forward. Even though the characteristics were at first difficult to understand these were the ways that I was able to connect them to our problem. 

  1. Vague Problem Definition 

Our problem is vague because exactly how do we address the public about the notable yet shameful history of Henry Shaw, we must consider that not everyone will be as willing to hear the truth about who Shaw was and the enslaved people he owned at the garden. Sustainable World explains that in a vague problem definition there is diversity amongst stakeholders, meaning that everyone may not agree with the issue or even view the problem as an issue. This fact reminds me of the discussion question held in research team with Dr. Jack, “What if at the Garden we begin publicly telling the stories of the enslaved people stakeholders and people who fund the garden no longer want to contribute?” To challenge this question, we entertained the thought that even if the MOBOT’s loses stakeholders and funding there is usually another group of stakeholders or means of funding that may be attracted to the truth of enslavement at the garden. 

  1. Undefined Solution 

With our problem in particular there is no specific solution. There isn’t any certain way to communicate with the public and address the injustices of Henry Shaw, the problem is how it’s been kept a secret from the public for so long and is only known to those that are impacted directly. On the Missouri Botanical Garden Website there is a page that attempts to approach the truth of slavery at the garden and further explains that the garden is working toward diversity and inclusion, this work is followed up by the goal of trying to tell the stories of the enslaved people at the garden. With the garden seeking to make a change they acknowledge that they are making their best efforts to involve the stories of the enslaved people stories as a part of the visitor experience. There’s no exact model or display of how the enslaved people’s stories are to be told, we don’t know if it’s a statue, plaque, article, brochure, no matter what we come up with it must communicate to the public about the truth. 

  1. No End Point 

This characteristic reminds me of a ripple effect once we implement a solution to the wicked problem, new problems can arise and cause cascading effects and unintended consequences. Even though we don’t intend for negative things to happen it is possible that they could. As I mentioned in vague problem definition even if the MOBOT loses its stakeholders and funding by telling the stories of enslaved people it could be detrimental to the functioning of the garden. Addressing the truth of Henry Shaw and the garden will be an ongoing process. The fact that the solution to our problem is undefined entails that there is no distinct form of resolution making it never ending. Sustainable World voices the idea that solutions must be continually adapted to new conditions, what may look like a resolution, may not look like a resolution later and more of a step either in the right or wrong direction. 

  1. Irreversible  

Just like posts made on social media once they are made public, they can’t be taken away, even if they are deleted after the fact, they are still accessible to the public. This same analogy works to represent the effectiveness of a solution or social media post, that will not change once it’s been implemented or posted. Sustainable World seconds this notion by indicating that implementing a solution creates changes in the world that can’t be undone and will have real consequences. The coolest yet scariest part about presenting this problem is that once we start finding solutions it won’t stop. Even if our entire cohort were to drop this project all together the MOBOT can review all our e-portfolios and see what our thoughts were and where they could start finding solutions. The irreversibility of resolving this problem and finding solutions is impactful and no matter what we do it will affect how the gardens present the truth to the public. 

  1. Unique  

The reason why we can characterize our problem as unique is because in most prominent places that involve enslavement there are museums, plaques, statues, or other forms of physical display to tell the stories of the enslaved people. Not to say that the gardens won’t one day have those forms of physical display but to tell the stories we can find many other ways to communicate the truth to the public in ways that are interactive or even digitally engaging. The uniqueness of our problem is carried by the idea that we are dealing with the truth of Henry Shaw and enslavement and as uncomfortable as this topic may seem MOBOT wants to make it a part of the visitor experience. We also may have to meet specific confidential requirements that can make our approach toward the truth look different from other places. We want to amplify the truth of the enslaved people without offending their families and making them feel uncomfortable about being in the garden. The uniqueness of our problem is weighed on by the means of people directly and indirectly affected by the garden and the garden’s history. 

  1. Urgent 

At first, I didn’t view this as a characteristic for our problem because we don’t have to meet any specific deadlines or due dates. With urgency we automatically think date and time it wasn’t until I read in Sustainable World, “Problems are urgent because of failure to act will result in permanent harm to human and natural systems.” This indicates that the problem is urgent in the matter of if we decide to do nothing about the truth, we put future generations in danger of being oblivious and ignorant of the truth. MOBOT’s website already communicated that they have no distinct way they want to communicate the truth to the public, but they’d like to try. As we partner with them in this project, we make their try into an effort induced push to think about possible solutions so that they don’t have to hide the truth any longer.  

Inconclusion 

Overall, our wicked problem is that we want to publicly communicate the hidden injustices of Henry Shaw and acknowledge how those enslaved people impacted the botanical garden, making it what it is today. Sustainable World introduces us to six characteristics of a wicked problem including: vague problem definition, undefined solution, no end point, irreversible, unique, and urgent. Our problem is vague because exactly how do we address the public about this hidden truth, which then makes the solution undefined. The irreversibility of resolving this problem and finding solutions is impactful and no matter what we do it will affect how the gardens present the truth to the public, this makes our whole problem unique. The urgency of this matter lies in the impacts we make in the present that will affect the future possibilities beyond MOBOT but the region’s historical enslavement background. 

 

Source Analysis #2 – TaKara

Source Analysis #2: Current State Analysis

When I read Sustainable World, Ch. 3: Current Analysis I gained a deeper understanding about approaches to analyzing and resolving wicked problems. This chapter was incredibly easy to comprehend, and I was able to grasp the overall key concepts because of the examples that were explained. The three key concepts that were highlighted in this chapter are defining the system and classifying drivers, casual chain analysis, and stakeholder analysis. All three of these concepts provided me with different strategies that altered my way of thinking about how to approach and perceive a wicked problem.

The first key concept in this chapter is defining the system and classifying drivers. In the beginning of my reading, I was oblivious to what the intent or use of the word “driver” was, when applying it to solving a problem. Sustainable World’s clearest explanation was that “Drivers are the governing forces that act on a system, either causing it to change or remain in itscurrent state,” (pg.124). Within this fact, I realized that drivers are more prominent factors of a system that makes it function in its current state. There are two main types of drivers: direct drivers and indirect drivers. From my understanding, direct drivers influence the behavior of a system more directly. As opposed to an indirect driver that influences the behavior of a system ina way that is more spread out by changing the direction of a direct driver. Sustainable World thenprovides visual representation of systems and drivers through examples found in socioecological systems. These visual representations allowed me to see the rippling effects of how drivers impact systems and the factors in drivers that influence systems.

The next key concept that is introduced in the chapter is casual chain analysis. Sustainable World defines casual chain analysis as “a tool for analyzing socioecological systems by classifying key drivers, establishing the relationships among drivers, and determining their relative influences on a system,” (pg. 123) The visual representation of systems that helped me understand what drivers are, were also examples of casual chain analysis. After reading about causal chain analysis, I was intrigued by the thought of what other ways casual chain analysis is used. I wanted to see more visual representations, so through a google search I was able to witness the different organizations in systems of casual analysis beyond the socioecological perspective. I noticed that some representations used more labeling with tables or graphing, others were simplistic with the causes and effects of a system. With the key concept casual chain analysis, I came to an understand that it is a tool for analyzing any system by classifying key drivers.
The final key concept that is exhibited in this chapter is stakeholder analysis. One of the best ways that I think Sustainable World communicated how stakeholders contribute to problem-solving is “However, the current state of analysis of a system is not complete until the people and organizations with a stake in a sustainability problem are considered. This is where stakeholder analysis comes into the picture,” (pg.161). This fact acknowledges how groups of individuals also play a role in impacting a system other than drivers. Stakeholders are the people that are impacted by the system regardless of how much or how little, some of them have authoritative influence within the system. For example, key stakeholders can be either indirectly or directly affected by a system yet possess the power to drastically impact a system. Sustainable World coherently addresses how important it is to be able to identify the types of stakeholders when problem solving.

Remington – Doucette, Sonya. Sustainable World. 2nd ed., Kendall Hunt Publishing Company, 2013. pp. 123, 124, 161.

Source Analysis #1: Wicked Problems

Source Analysis #1

When opening this chapter, I was very curious as to what a wicked problem was. The textbook defined a wicked problem as “difficult problems that cannot be addressed using only traditional approaches, such as scientific technological advances, and that require continuous attention because they can never be completely solved” this reminded me of the reparative justice cohort. We are all tryingto publicly communicate the injustices of Henry Shaw and acknowledge how those enslaved people impacted the botanical garden, making it what it is today. The textbook also provides general characteristics of a wicked problem: vague problem definition, undefined solution, no end point, irreversible, unique, urgent. In my opinion I believe that our wicked problem is characterized by each of the following characteristics. The problem is vague because exactly how do we address the public about the notable yet shameful history of Henery Shaw, this all makes the solution undefined. Even though we could find a solution as technology advances and life goes on there will be more ways to communicate this problem, this leads to a never-ending turmoil. Regardless of what our solution looks like the effectiveness of what we do is irreversible, this makes the whole problem unique. Although there isn’t any drastic urgence of the matter, I think it is important to bring light to this problem because of how much the background history impacts the present and future possibilities beyond the botanical gardens but the region as a whole.