Author: soovert

Mixed Methods Lab- Sophia Overturf

SURVEY

This Lab consists of 2 parts, those being our surveys and the focus group we conducted. The other people in my group are Kyra, Jaidyn, and Jay, our research question is “How does colonialism affect the garden and herbarium”. Sadly, our survey wasn’t very helpful, with us only getting a singular response. This was disappointing because we put a lot of effort into making sure it was perfect and that our questions wouldn’t be difficult to answer. Leading to all of us wondering what we could have done wrong, as we understood it was a topic people didn’t really want to talk about. Due to its uncomfortable nature, but it still is important even if people don’t want to talk about it. We are trying to bring it to a better light, but due to the heaviness of our question. We think it’s the reason for the singular response we got. 

FOCUS GROUP

Due to the lack of responses to our Lab it is a bit difficult to properly answer this lab. However, our focus group interview went a lot better than the surveys, because we actually had people with us to answer the questions we were asking. A question we asked was “what programs do you think MOBOT most effectively educates visitors about the impacts of colonialism on botanical knowledge?”. An answer to this question was that they had a table at the orchid show to help people learn and they would talk about the practices of acquiring the orchids. Which is a start to the education of colonialism, but a singular table isn’t going to have the big impact that they are looking for if they want to properly inform visitors. Another question that we asked was “how do you think we could bring information to the people who come to the garden about the historical practices within the garden?” An answer that we got was that they are actively working on ways to bring information to these people and they are working cross program, which means multiple parts of the garden are working together to find a way to get that information out. 

when our interview was put into voyant

With our research I don’t think we’ve learned everything that we needed to know. As there is still so much, we could have learned if people answered our survey. I think maybe for our study next time that we maybe make the questions either more simple or try basing our questions on how our peers made their surveys. As they all got a lot more answers than we did, they must have done something that we just didn’t. I have nothing specific that I want to know currently but, the information I would like to know more is for the partners to elaborate a bit more about what they said in our focus group. So, we could get an even better idea of what they are working towards that relates to our research topic. 

Archival Traces Reflection- Sophia Overturf

Sophia Overturf 

CODES 

Dr. Hildebrandt 

February 6th ,2024 

Last week we went to the Botanical Gardens to visit the archives. During this visit I had the opportunity alongside my cohort to view the plant specimens and records that went with them. Some being from as far back as the late 1800s. Coming to the gardens, I did not know very much about what we were coming to look at. But after visiting I got a bit more of an idea of plant collection and the people collecting them. 

We saw a lot of old plants, specifically Yucca tree and many of the samples coming from the time period of 1870s-1930s. North American plants are more commonly collected since we live in north America, they have a lot of some plants and very little of others due to botanists not wanting to venture further into forests and other places due to fear of being poisoned by the plants. However, some of the plants that they have information on are databased and have their own number with a bar code. There was a lot of bias when it came to the documents, mainly because some of them came from over 100 years ago. As those botanists were mainly old, white, men, who wanted to put their names on anything they could. 

The specimens that we looked at were collected by C.G.Pringle, Jared G. Smith, George Angelman, and Ferdinand Lindheimer(who was one of the first collectors from what is now known as Texas. The purposes for which they were collected were mainly research and other scientific purposes. The people who are being silenced by these researchers are the native people who originally used these plants and the people who helped them collect the specimens. They are silenced because we do not know anything about these people, and they likely weren’t documented so we may never know anything about these people. So, we must learn about them based on these plants and what they are used for. As some are extremely vital to our current medical practices to make medicines. 

Even though sometimes we do not have much information about these plants or the people who originally used them. Even with the people being silenced, we can still try to understand the significance of the plants. We still need to try to understand the whole picture and the stakeholders that are associated with it. Since we are the ones coming up with solutions, I think that visiting the achieves is a starting point for the big picture and gives us more opportunities to explore in the future